Activity Reviews
Review completed activities, capture inspection outcomes and maintain submission history.
QA/QC
A percentage update alone does not tell management whether completed work meets the acceptance criteria. CPCS connects physical completion to authorised review, inspection, correction and evidence.
The quality workflow
Work reaches the agreed physical completion point.
Authorised QA/QC reviewers approve, reject or require correction and resubmission.
Inspections, ITPs and Checklists provide structured acceptance evidence.
NCRs, snags and Quality Records preserve the correction and close-out trail.
Current V1.1 scope
Review completed activities, capture inspection outcomes and maintain submission history.
Raise and maintain inspection records with project references, outcomes and comments.
Track non-conformance, ownership, root cause, corrective action and verification.
Maintain defect lists, priorities, owners, due dates and verification status.
Define stages, tests, acceptance criteria, responsible parties and Hold / Witness / Review / Surveillance points.
Use repeatable line items with Pending, Pass, Fail and N/A responses tied to inspections or ITPs.
Build a traceable project quality dossier linked back to inspections, NCRs, snags, ITPs, checklists, activities and documents.
Review pending, rejected and outstanding quality workload before accepting project completion or close-out.
ITPs & Checklists
ITPs let teams set the required inspection and test sequence. Checklists turn those criteria into repeatable item-by-item verification, while failed items can be routed into the appropriate corrective workflow.
See the CPCS quality workflow from Activity Review through ITP, Checklist, NCR and Quality Record.